Additive4.5
Process Mapping of Ti-6Al-4V Solidification Microstructure Across Two E-Beam AM Processes

Tuesday, June 17, 2014: 4:00 PM
Tallahassee 2 (Gaylord Palms Resort )
Prof. Jack Beuth , Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Joy Gockel , Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Daniel Christiansen , Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Prof. Ola Harrysson , North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Timothy Horn , North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Ronald Aman , North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Harvey West , North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Karen Taminger , NASA Langley, Hampton, VA
In direct metal additive manufacturing (AM), the ability to predict and control as-deposited microstructure can reduce post-processing and speed qualification.  In this work, modeling and experimental results are presented for Ti64 prior beta grain size and morphology for two direct metal AM processes:  Electron Beam Melting (EBM) by Arcam and Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF3) from NASA Langley.  Both EBM and EBF3 use electron beams in a high vacuum environment. The EBM process is conducted in a powder bed.  EBF3 is a wire feed process operating within a very different region of processing space.  For each process, methods for maintaining microstructural features across process variables are identified as are ranges of prior beta grain sizes.  Comparisons are then made between the processes to identify common traits and ranges of microstructural features available across the entire direct metal AM processing space.  Results for this talk are for single bead deposits but methods are identified for extension to other geometries.
See more of: Processes
See more of: Additive Manufacturing