Additive Manufacturing for Rapid Spares Replacement: AM Assisted Casting vs Direct Metal Printing
This project demonstrated a significant lead time reduction in the design and manufacturing of F/A-18 C/D Gun Bay Door Louver spare parts, using both direct Additive Manufacturing (AM) and indirect AM Assisted Investment Casting methods. With both methods demonstrated, future spares efforts will be able to make use of the data obtained as well as the proven success of the manufacturing methods in order to meet part lead time requirements. For direct printing, an aluminum Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) machine was used. For indirect manufacturing, a Binderjet AM machine was used to produce the PMMA patterns for an aluminum investment casting.
Using AM for large, thin-walled, aluminum casting replacements without significant redesign has only recently become a possibility. Today, aluminum powder bed machines are available that can accommodate this large part for direct printing, and AM can assist in the investment casting process, due to advances in polymer pattern printing that have made thin wall patterns possible without the risk of cracking the ceramic shell.
In this presentation, we share cost and quality comparisons between these two additive manufacturing technology demonstrators, and how these lessons learned are being applied for current spares needs.