About the problematic to deduce valid strength and durability data from LPBF of high strength Aluminum alloys
Unfortunately, this is not the case for LPBF generated parts or test bodies. Owing its inherent surface roughness and a variety of bulk material imperfections a stress driven description and analysis of the test samples is notoriously invalid as the localized stress evolution after loading the part appears extremely undefined. Clear differentiation between machined test bodies and "as built" rough test elements is necessary. Part durability as well load bearing capabilities are affected extraordinary by the LPBF build conditions, the build platform that was used as well where it was located in the build chamber. A new more formalized approach is necessary to extract the desired/required performance data so that stress and quality engineers are satisfied and able to release and approve 3D-printed parts. Especially for high strength Al-alloy applications where LPBF has to compete against fully (easy) machined parts (from "safe" plates materials) such a "remedy" is inevitable. The presentation will show some ideas to cope with this challenge.