Developing an adaptively-remeshed multiphysical resistance forge weld model, with extensive validation from residual stress measurement techniques

Tuesday, October 21, 2025: 11:20 AM
Dr. Andrew J. Stershic , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Dr. Christopher R. D'Elia , Level Engineering, Inc., Woodland, CA
Dr. Lauren L. Beghini , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Prof. Michael R. Hill , University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
Dr. Bjørn Clausen , Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
Dr. Dorian K. Balch , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Dr. Michael C. Maguire , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Dr. Christopher W. San Marchi , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Dr. James W. Foulk, III , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Mr. Alexander A. Hanson , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Dr. Kevin L. Manktelow , Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA
Understanding residual stress fields in manufactured components is crucial for predicting their performance under service loads; tensile residual stress can compromise strength, especially near stress concentrators or under cyclic loading conditions. This study introduces a multiphysical weld process model aimed at predicting the configuration and residual stress fields in a resistance-forge-welded port of a pressure vessel. Utilizing Lagrangian finite element analysis with adaptive remeshing, the model effectively addresses the significant deformations associated with welding. A comprehensive constitutive model is employed to capture material changes, including dynamic recrystallization during solid-state welding.

Model validation is achieved through displacement measurements and three residual stress estimation techniques: contour method, slitting method, and neutron diffraction, with a focus on hoop and axial stresses across three planes. The model’s configuration is further refined to align with destructive testing processes, enabling direct comparisons to measured residual stresses. Cross-validation of the contour method hoop-stress comparison was performed by simulating the contour cut and examining the relaxation displacement.

Results indicate a strong correlation between the model and measurements, particularly for axial stress from the slitting method, with a discussion on factors influencing discrepancies between model predictions and experimental data.

See more of: Research Spotlight Session
See more of: Technical Program