The Efficacy of a Chelating Agent-Based Oxide Remover to Clean Corrosion Products from Ferrous Fracture Surfaces

Monday, October 26, 2020: 4:00 PM
N/A Aphrodite Anastasia Strifas , University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD
Michael Budinski , National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., DC
Edward Komarnicki , National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., DC
Mrs. Nancy McAtee , National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC
Matthew Fox , National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC
Dr. Erik Mueller , National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC
Frank Zakar , National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., DC
Challenges exist when cleaning fracture surfaces to reveal fractographic features without damaging the fracture surfaces further. This technical paper will compare the efficacy of cleaning ferrous-based fracture surfaces with a chelating stripping agent versus inhibited acid solutions. The chelating stripping agent used in this study was commercially available Evapo-Rust. The inhibited acid solutions used in this study were ASTM G1 C.3.1 solution and ASTM G1 C.3.5 solution. In this study, metallographically prepared samples of annealed type 8620 steel were immersed in the ASTM G1 C.3.1 solution, ASTM G1 C.3.5 solution, and Evapo-Rust for different times under inactive and ultrasonic conditions. The extent of damage to the polished surfaces was qualitatively examined using various types of optical microscopy. The sample damage was visually compared to a baseline sample etched with 2% natal. The indices used to qualify the extent of damage were the existence of pits and microstructural etching. It was found that a chelating agent-based oxide remover causes less etching and pitting on metallographically prepared annealed type 8620 steel samples than inhibited acid solutions.
See more of: Failure Analysis
See more of: The Virtual Edition