Wednesday, 20 August 2003
This presentation is part of : Diagnosis of Dementia in Specific Populations: People Who Are Illiterate, Different Ethnic Groups and Cultures and Centenarians

S066-003 Diagnostic Procedures and Harmonization of Instruments in Cross-Cultural Studies

Adesola Ogunniyi1, Kathleen S Hall2, Olusegun Baiyewu3, and Hugh Hendrie2. (1) Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, (2) Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA, (3) Department of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

The Indianapolis-Ibadan cross-cultural study compares African-Americans with Yoruba-Africans with respect to the prevalence and incidence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease as well as the risk factors. The Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI’D) was used to screen consenting community-dwelling, elderly subjects in Indianapolis, USA and Ibadan, Nigeria during the three waves of the study (prevalence and two incidence waves). The validated CSI’D which was harmonized to the Yoruba culture had a sensitivity of 87.02% and specificity of 83.12% for dementia diagnosis in that population. A stratified sample of the participants at the two sites was selected for clinical assessment based on their performance on the CSI’D.

The diagnostic process included consideration of data collected from a structured interview with a key informant and from a neuropsychological test battery modified from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD. Interpretation of this was based on local normative data. Detailed examination by a physician followed by laboratory investigations including imaging studies completed the assessments. The diagnoses of dementia and the subtypes were made according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual –Third edition revised (DSM-IIIR) and the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10). Final diagnoses were arrived at during consensus conferences (both on-site and inter-site with blinding). Discrepant diagnoses were reviewed at joint consensus conference. The coefficients of agreement for dementia diagnosis between sites (kappa) varied between 0.79 and 0.87. The use of identical methods at the two sites and consistent performance on the screening instrument as well as consensus diagnoses made comparability of results possible. The presentation will highlight the implication of the results.

Back to S066 Diagnosis of Dementia in Specific Populations: People Who Are Illiterate, Different Ethnic Groups and Cultures and Centenarians
Back to The Eleventh International Congress