Monday, 18 August 2003
This presentation is part of : Ethical Issues in Cutting Edge Research: The Role of Research Monitoring Boards

S001-001 Research Monitoring Boards in the United States: An Overview

Elyn Saks, The Law School, The Law School, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Monitoring human research is an important imperative that has received increasing attention. This presentation addresses the pros and cons of real-time monitoring of research, through either a Data and Safety Monitoring Board with additional functions, Research Subject Advocates, or a new board, what we call a Research Monitoring Board (RMB). The talk addresses why, in certain circumstances, we might want real-time monitoring-e.g. unforeseen circumstances may call for additional ethical scrutiny. The talk also addresses when real-time monitoring should be used-e.g. the research is very high risk, or the subject is very vulnerable. It also addresses what a real-time monitoring board would do-e.g. observe and evaluate the consent process and monitor the progress of individual subjects to determine when they should be disenrolled. The talk finally addresses who would serve on a real-time monitoring board. Real-time monitoring, in the end, can be seen as part of a balance: it adds to the costs of studies but may help ensure ethical research and therefore increase the likelihood of acceptance from patients, their families, and the community-at-large.

Back to S001 Ethical Issues in Cutting Edge Research: The Role of Research Monitoring Boards
Back to The Eleventh International Congress